My shopping cart
Your cart is currently empty.
Continue ShoppingSpaceEve is committed to delivering accurate, well-sourced, and accessible reporting on space, astronomy, and scientific discovery.
These standards define the principles that guide our journalism and the expectations we hold for all published content.
SpaceEve’s primary goal is to:
Provide reliable, timely coverage of space and astronomy
Translate complex scientific information into clear, understandable reporting
Highlight missions, discoveries, and research that advance human understanding of the universe
Editorial work is independent from all commercial activity.
Merchandise does not influence what we publish or how we frame coverage.
Accuracy begins with credible sourcing. SpaceEve relies on:
Official releases from national space agencies (NASA, ESA, JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, and others)
Peer-reviewed scientific papers and reputable research institutions
Mission data, technical briefings, and primary source documents
Verified statements from qualified scientists, engineers, and researchers
Before publication:
Core facts (dates, measurements, mission data, statements, scientific claims) are independently verified
Unconfirmed, early, or evolving findings are clearly labelled
Speculative or fringe material is avoided unless placed within proper scientific context
We do not publish rumours or unverified claims.
SpaceEve maintains a strong commitment to accuracy.
Substantive corrections that alter meaning or factual interpretation are clearly noted
Minor edits (grammar, wording, formatting) may be made without a formal note when they do not affect factual content
Articles may be updated as new mission data, scientific findings, or official information becomes available
Readers are encouraged to report potential errors for prompt review.
Although SpaceEve operates a small merchandise line, editorial integrity is protected by strict separation:
News and analysis are produced independently of commercial goals
Coverage is not shaped by product releases or marketing plans
No article is used for disguised promotion
Any future sponsored content will be clearly labelled
The editorial mission always takes priority.
Scientific reporting requires accuracy and context. SpaceEve aims to:
Explain scientific concepts in plain language without distorting the underlying science
Provide context that helps readers understand significance, limitations, and open questions
Clearly distinguish between established science, emerging research, and theoretical speculation
Avoid sensationalism, exaggeration, and misleading narratives
Our goal is to inform with precision, not to entertain with distortion.
SpaceEve uses imagery to support understanding of scientific topics. Visuals may include:
Photographs and data from space agencies (credited appropriately)
Mission diagrams, charts, and scientific illustrations
Artist impressions where real imagery is unavailable
AI-assisted or concept imagery used for educational clarity
Non-photographic or interpretive visuals are identified as such in the surrounding context.
AI tools may support aspects of the editorial process, including background research, drafting assistance, and visual generation. However:
All editorial decisions and final reviews are made by a human editor
No AI-generated material is published without verification
We do not accept fabricated information, hallucinated citations, or artificial scientific claims
Technology assists the process but does not replace editorial judgement.
SpaceEve’s reporting is intended for:
Space enthusiasts
Science learners and educators
General readers seeking accurate, accessible explanations
Our tone is:
Professional and evidence-based
Clear and direct
Curious and educational
Respectful of scientific nuance
We aim to support scientific literacy while maintaining readability for a broad audience.
Readers play an important role in maintaining high standards.
To suggest corrections, provide additional context, or recommend topics for coverage, readers may contact:
[Insert editorial email]
All credible feedback receives review from the editorial team.
SpaceEve reviews these standards periodically to reflect:
Evolving best practices in science communication
Improvements in verification methods
Growth of the editorial team
Input from our readers and scientific community
Major revisions will be documented with an updated revision date.
Last updated: 12.12. 2025